Amazfit Band 7 vs Fitbit Inspire 3: Worth Spending More?

In comparing the Amazfit Band 7 vs Fitbit Inspire 3, it became apparent that each fitness tracker brings its own strengths to the table, catering to diverse user needs.

During my assessment, I meticulously examined design elements, battery life, and the range of features offered by these devices.

The Amazfit Band 7 stands out with its extended battery life, offering up to 18 days of usage on a single charge, as compared to the 10 days that the Fitbit Inspire 3 provides. This difference is significant for those seeking a device with less frequent charging cycles.

From a design and build quality standpoint, the Fitbit Inspire 3 is compact and sports a user-friendly interface. It fits comfortably on the wrist and features a simple yet efficient display.

On the other hand, the Amazfit Band 7 comes equipped with a higher resolution screen, which enhances visibility and interaction.

Functionality-wise, the Amazfit Band 7 expands its tracking competencies with features such as route tracking, perspiration monitoring, and temperature tracking, which I found to offer detailed insights into my workout sessions and overall health.

Key Takeaways

  • The Amazfit Band 7 excels in battery life and advanced health tracking features.
  • The Fitbit Inspire 3 provides a more user-friendly interface with adequate fitness tracking capabilities.
  • Both devices offer a compelling value proposition, but differ in their brand ecosystems and community engagement.

Design and Build Quality

When examining the Amazfit Band 7 and the Fitbit Inspire 3, I focused on their design and build quality, paying particular attention to how their aesthetics and construction contribute to daily usage.

Physical Dimensions and Aesthetics

The Fitbit Inspire 3 and Amazfit Band 7 both exhibit a rectangular design that is common in many fitness trackers. The Inspire 3 has a more streamlined look, which is both minimalistic and fashionable. On the other hand, the Band 7’s design is slightly bulkier, yet remains quite stylish. Each of these devices’ aesthetics leans towards a modern and sleek appearance that does not detract from their functionality.

Display Characteristics

Both devices are equipped with AMOLED displays, offering vivid colors and deep blacks, enhancing visibility during various lighting conditions. The Amazfit Band 7 boasts a resolution of 198 x 368 pixels which is higher than the Inspire 3’s resolution of 124 x 208 pixels. This results in a sharper image and better overall clarity on the Band 7’s screen. The screen size advantage also goes to the Band 7 with its 1.47-inch display against Inspire 3’s 1.55-inch — both providing ample space for navigation and reading data.

Durability and Resistance

Concerning durability, both trackers offer water resistance — a vital feature for an active lifestyle. I found the Fitbit Inspire 3 to have a water-resistant rating of up to 50 meters, a standard among fitness trackers. The Amazfit Band 7 matches this, suggesting that both are suitable for swimming and can handle exposure to rain and sweat without issue.

Comfort and Wearability

Both bands prioritize comfort with lightweight designs that are easy to wear all day and night. The silicone straps provided by both models are soft to the touch and don’t cause irritation even after prolonged use. The Fitbit Inspire 3 feels slightly lighter on the wrist, which could be an advantage for those who favor a nearly unnoticeable presence.

Color Options and Personalization

I appreciate personalization options in wearable tech, and both the Inspire 3 and Band 7 deliver in this department. The Fitbit Inspire 3 is available in black and pink hues, while the Amazfit Band 7 is typically found in a classic black strap. Straps can be swapped out to suit personal style, with a variety of third-party options available for further customization.

Overview of Design Comparisons

Across the board, the Amazfit Band 7 and Fitbit Inspire 3 share similar ethos in their design language, both opting for a mix of lifestyle appeal and practicality. The Band 7’s higher screen resolution and larger display area may appeal to those who prioritize screen quality, while the Inspire 3 offers a slight edge in the comfort and weight department. Both devices exhibit reliable build quality and are equipped to withstand the rigors of everyday fitness activities.

Features and Functionalities

In my experience with the Amazfit Band 7 and the Fitbit Inspire 3, I’ve noticed each offers a unique set of features and functionalities that cater to various preferences and health and fitness needs.

Smart Features and Connectivity

The Amazfit Band 7 offers a range of smart functionalities, including notification alerts and music control. It connects via Bluetooth and offers a practical weather forecast feature. On the contrary, Fitbit Inspire 3 also pairs via Bluetooth and supports smart notifications. Both devices do not have built-in GPS but offer connected GPS capabilities when paired with a compatible smartphone.

Fitness and Health Tracking

For fitness enthusiasts, the Amazfit Band 7 tracks activities with its built-in sports modes and monitors perspiration, which is beneficial for intense workout sessions. Fitbit Inspire 3’s health tracking abilities are robust, offering heart rate monitoring, sleep analysis, and a blood oxygen (SpO2) monitor. Both devices utilize their own metric systems for overall fitness tracking (PAI for Amazfit and Active Zone Minutes for Fitbit).

Compatibility with External Devices

Both fitness trackers play well with Android and iOS devices. Amazfit integrates through the Zepp app, while the Fitbit Inspire 3 uses the Fitbit app. This compatibility ensures that my data syncs seamlessly to my smartphone for a comprehensive view of my health statistics over time.

Software and App Integration

The ecosystem of each brand is apparent in their software offerings. Fitbit Inspire 3’s integration with the Fitbit ecosystem allows for functionalities like menstrual health tracking and detailed sleep insights. Amazfit Band 7’s software, linked to the Zepp app, offers customization options, such as widgets and a variety of watch faces.

Notification and Communication Services

Quick replies are available on both devices when paired with an Android phone, which I find convenient for sending short responses to messages. However, neither allows for voice commands or has a built-in speaker for calls.

Other Utility Features

Both wearables include essential features that add to everyday convenience, such as alarms, timers, and event reminders. The Fitbit Inspire 3 doesn’t have a temperature sensor, unlike the Amazfit Band 7, which can monitor ambient temperature — a subtle yet appreciated addition to its feature set. Neither provides NFC for contactless payments, nor an ECG monitor, which is more commonly found in advanced smartwatches.

Battery and Charging

In my experience with both Amazfit Band 7 and Fitbit Inspire 3, battery life and charging capabilities are critical aspects that set them apart.

Battery Life and Endurance

Amazfit Band 7 promises a battery life of up to 18 days, a significant endurance advantage over its counterpart. My testing confirmed that under typical usage scenarios, the band consistently reached close to this mark. In contrast, the Fitbit Inspire 3 offers a shorter battery life, capable of lasting up to 10 days on a single charge. It’s adequate but doesn’t match the longevity of the Band 7.

Charging Methods and Times

Charging the Amazfit Band 7 is straightforward, thanks to its magnetic charging base. It typically reaches a full charge within 2 hours. Similarly, the Fitbit Inspire 3 charges via a magnetic attachment, and my tests showed it also refuels in about the same time. Neither device supports wireless charging, but the process is efficient for both.

Battery Performance in Real-World Use

When it comes to real-world performance, both fitness trackers easily get through a full day of extensive use, which includes constant heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and notifications. However, the Amazfit Band 7 edges ahead, as I’ve noticed less battery drain during activities utilizing connected GPS. In contrast, the Fitbit Inspire 3 manages to maintain consistent performance but requires more frequent charges throughout a typical two-week period.

Fitness and Health Monitoring Capabilities

Having extensively tested both the Amazfit Band 7 and the Fitbit Inspire 3, I’ve found that each fitness tracker offers a unique set of features that cater to various fitness and health monitoring needs. Specifically, they differ in their approach to tracking sports activities, analyzing health data, and supporting fitness goals.

Sport Modes and Exercise Tracking

In my experience, the Amazfit Band 7 comes with a broad variety of sports modes, making it versatile for exercise tracking across different sports, such as cycling and walking. The Fitbit Inspire 3 also keeps a detailed log of workouts and activities. Both trackers record heart rate during exercises which is crucial for monitoring workout intensity.

Health Metrics Analysis

The Fitbit Inspire 3 shines with its sleep tracking and heart rate variability analysis. Meanwhile, my use of the Amazfit Band 7 revealed it to provide a comprehensive evaluation of health metrics, like blood oxygen (SpO2) levels and skin temperature variation. These features are beneficial for a thorough health analysis.

Fitness Progress and Goal Setting

Both devices facilitate setting and tracking fitness goals effectively. I appreciated the user-friendly interface of the Fitbit app, which helped me in setting clear and measurable goals. The Amazfit Band 7, with its integrated VO2 max estimates and training load evaluations, provides deep insights for those looking to push their limits.

Accuracy and Precision of Sensors

Accuracy is a crucial factor, and during my testing, I found both the Fitbit Inspire 3 and the Amazfit Band 7 to offer reliable sensor readings. The heart rate sensor accuracy was comparable during most activities, though individual performance can vary based on fit and movement.

Specialized Features for Fitness Enthusiasts

For committed fitness enthusiasts, features like the Amazfit Band 7’s perspiration monitoring and temperature tracking stand out, while the Fitbit Inspire 3’s reputation for consistent performance and integration with the Fitbit ecosystem may be more appealing for a seamless fitness tracking experience.

Comparison of Fitness and Health Features

FeatureAmazfit Band 7Fitbit Inspire 3
Sports ModesMultipleMultiple
Heart Rate MonitorYesYes
Blood Oxygen (SpO2)YesNo
Skin TemperatureYesNo
Sleep TrackingYesYes
Training Load AnalysisYesNo
VO2 Max EstimationYesNo (Fitbit Premium Required)
App IntegrationZepp AppFitbit App
Battery LifeUp to 18 daysUp to 10 days

Having personally used these features, I can affirm that both fitness trackers cater well to a variety of fitness and health monitoring needs, with their own strengths and focuses.

Price and Value Proposition

When comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and Fitbit Inspire 3, an analysis of their pricing and value is essential for consumers looking to make an informed decision. I’ll dissect their cost-effectiveness and additional expenses tied to their ecosystems.

Cost Comparison

The Amazfit Band 7 typically retails around $50, while the Fitbit Inspire 3 comes in slightly higher at about $80. These price points reflect the standard market value for entry-level fitness trackers.

Budget-Friendly Options

Those on a strict budget may lean towards the Amazfit Band 7 due to its lower upfront cost. It’s an affordable introduction to fitness tracking without sacrificing essential features.

Value for Money Analysis

Despite its higher price, the Fitbit Inspire 3 offers a well-established ecosystem that includes a comprehensive app and site for in-depth health tracking. The Amazfit Band 7, while less expensive, still maintains competitive quality, making it a strong contender in terms of overall value.

Investment in Health and Fitness

Investing in a fitness tracker like the Fitbit Inspire 3 or the Amazfit Band 7 means I’m committing to my health and fitness goals. The long-term benefits of health tracking features can justify the initial investment.

Accessory Ecosystem and Additional Costs

Fitbit’s accessory ecosystem is expansive, but additional bands and clips can accrue costs. Amazfit accessories tend to be more affordable, keeping total expenditures down.

Price as a Factor in Comparison

For my comparison, price is a critical factor. The Fitbit Inspire 3’s higher cost corresponds to its robust app ecosystem and brand reputation for quality. In contrast, the Amazfit Band 7’s affordability makes it a budget-friendly option without compromising much on functionality.

Brand Ecosystem and Community

When comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Fitbit Inspire 3, we’re not just looking at the devices themselves, but the entire ecosystem and community each brand has cultivated. As an experienced user, I’ve explored the depths of both brand’s offerings, from the devices to their respective apps, and the community involvement.

Fitbit’s Ecosystem

Fitbit has built a comprehensive ecosystem that dovetails neatly with their wearables, such as the Fitbit Charge 5 and Fitbit Inspire 3. My engagement with the Fitbit app has been integral to my experience. It’s a well-oiled hub for tracking my fitness progress, logging health data, and receiving personalized insights. The app acts as a central site in the Fitbit experience, where users can join a community to compete in challenges or share success stories.

Amazfit’s Ecosystem

Conversely, Amazfit, with devices like the Amazfit Band 7, uses the Zepp app (formerly known as Amazfit app) as the cornerstone of its ecosystem. As a user, I’ve found that the Zepp app offers a broad array of tracking metrics and insights. Amazfit’s site and app sync to provide a unified experience, but compared to Fitbit, the ecosystem feels slightly less integrated due to a less robust community aspect.

Community Support and Resources

Fitbit’s community resources are impressive. They have an active online forum where I’ve been able to connect with other users to discuss experiences and share tips. Amazfit’s community support, while growing, seems less centralized; user engagement is more scattered across various online platforms rather than a single dedicated site.

Brand Loyalty and User Experience

Brand loyalty is cultivated through consistent user experience. My time with Fitbit products has been marked by a sense of familiarity and continuity across devices, which has encouraged my brand loyalty. Amazfit, while offering quality hardware, feels a bit more disjointed across its product line, making the loyalty to the brand’s ecosystem a bit less compelling for some users.

In essence, both brands strive to create communities and offer a consistent user experience through their ecosystems, and your choice may hinge on these aspects as much as on the hardware itself.

Final Verdict and Recommendations

In this section, I’ll cover a detailed comparison and guide you through picking the right model for your needs. I have extensively used both the Amazfit Band 7 and the Fitbit Inspire 3, analyzing their performance, quality, and value.

Comprehensive Comparison Summary

Amazfit Band 7:

  • Battery Life: 18 days
  • Display Resolution: 198 x 368px
  • Unique Features: Route tracker, perspiration monitor, BMI tracking

Fitbit Inspire 3:

  • Battery Life: 10 days
  • Display Resolution: 124 x 208px
  • Ecosystem: More extensive, with better integration into iOS and Android

Comparing the essential aspects of each model, I’ve found that the Amazfit Band 7 offers a longer battery life and higher display resolution, while the Fitbit Inspire 3 benefits from the solid Fitbit ecosystem.

Choosing Based on User Needs

When deciding between the two, consider the Amazfit Band 7 for a more affordable option with high-end features. On the other hand, if you’re invested in the Android or iOS ecosystem and want seamless integration with a wide range of health apps, the Fitbit Inspire 3 is the smarter choice.

Pros and Cons of Each Model

Amazfit Band 7:

  • Pros: Cost-effective, longer battery life, comprehensive health tracking features
  • Cons: Less integrated into the broader Android or iOS ecosystems

Fitbit Inspire 3:

  • Pros: Strong ecosystem support, easy synchronization with health apps, established brand reliability
  • Cons: Higher price point, shorter battery life compared to Amazfit Band 7

Considering both models, I noticed the trade-off between price and ecosystem integration, with Amazfit Band 7 winning on the former and Fitbit Inspire 3 on the latter.

Future-Proofing with the Right Choice

When choosing a fitness tracker, it is crucial to think about not only the current performance and quality but also how well it will fit into future developments of smart wearables. With an established presence, Fitbit’s Inspire 3 is likely to have better support and integration moving forward, while the Amazfit Band 7, built by the growing brand Xiaomi, presents an excellent value now with potential for future growth.


  • Matthew

    Meet Matthew, a wearable tech & fitness enthusiast passionate about transforming health through innovative devices. With an engineering background and a love for fitness, Matthew shares in-depth reviews, tips, and news on the latest wearable tech to help you achieve your fitness goals.

Scroll to Top