Amazfit Band 7 vs Garmin Vivosmart 5: Head-to-Head Fitness Tracker Comparison

In the world of affordable fitness trackers, two options often come to mind: the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5.

Both devices offer a host of features aimed at the budget-conscious user, yet they distinguish themselves in unique ways. I’ll explore how each model stacks up in design, functionality, and overall value.

Comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5 is an exercise in assessing what users value most in a fitness tracker. The Amazfit Band 7 boasts a lengthy battery life and a vibrant display, which are key selling points for many. In contrast, the Garmin Vivosmart 5 pivots on brand reputation and specific fitness features that cater to a dedicated user base.

When it comes down to the details, each tracker brings its own set of perks to the table, such as the Amazfit Band 7’s high-resolution display and the Vivosmart 5’s focus on precision tracking. My aim is to dissect these features, offer clear insights, and help you determine which device could best fit your lifestyle.

Design and Aesthetics

In comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin vivosmart 5, I find it imperative to examine their design and aesthetics in detail, from the materials used to their comfort on the wrist.

Material and Build Quality

The Amazfit Band 7 is designed with durability in mind, featuring a body that suggests a combination of plastic and glass. This gives it a lightweight feel without compromising on resilience. On the other hand, the Garmin vivosmart 5 also utilizes a robust build that seems capable of withstanding daily wear and tear, likely attributed to damage-resistant glass and a sturdy polymer case.

Color Options

When it comes to colors, the Amazfit Band 7 is available in several shades including black, blue, and pink, catering to a variety of personal styles. The Garmin vivosmart 5 typically comes in a more conservative color palette, primarily black, which appeals to those who prefer a classic, understated look.

Display Technology

The display is a pivotal aspect of any fitness tracker. The Amazfit Band 7 boasts a vibrant AMOLED display, providing crisp visuals and deep colors. Contrastingly, the Garmin vivosmart 5 features an OLED display that, although may not be as bright as AMOLED, still offers clear readability with an efficient power consumption profile.

Comfort and Wearability

Comfort is key, and both devices strive to provide it. The Amazfit Band 7 is notably thinner and lighter, which may contribute to an almost forgettable presence on the wrist during daily activities. Despite that, the Garmin vivosmart 5 has its merits in wearability with a design that’s narrower, potentially offering a more snug fit for users with smaller wrists.

Features and Capabilities

In comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5, we’re looking at two fitness trackers that stand out due to their array of features. Each device offers unique health and fitness monitoring tools, user-friendly smart features, different approaches to battery life and charging, and various levels of water resistance.

Health and Fitness Monitoring

Both the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5 provide comprehensive health and fitness tracking capabilities. The Amazfit Band 7 boasts over 120 sports modes, providing detailed data across a wide array of activities. It tracks user’s heart rate, monitors sleep quality, and measures blood oxygen levels. The Vivosmart 5, apart from the standard features such as heart rate and activity tracking, also offers incident detection for certain activities.

For activity and sports tracking, the Garmin Vivosmart 5 covers basics like walking, cycling, and swimming, while the Amazfit Band 7 extends this with a more extensive list including yoga, strength training, and more. Both trackers are equipped with essential sensors including an accelerometer and gyroscope for accurate activity data.

Smart Features

The smart capabilities of both devices include notifications for calls, texts, and apps when connected to a smartphone via Bluetooth. The Band 7 further extends its smart features with integration of Amazon’s Alexa for voice assistance, offering functionality such as setting alarms or checking the weather hands-free.

The Vivosmart 5 keeps things simple with no voice feedback but focuses on functional connectivity, enabling users to control their music and use the ‘find my phone’ feature. Both devices lack NFC payments and Wi-Fi connectivity, focusing on core functionalities.

Battery and Charging

Battery life is crucial, and here the Amazfit Band 7 stands out with up to 18 days of battery life, a significant increase over the Vivosmart 5’s 7 days. Neither device supports wireless charging, but both have proprietary charging cables that allow for easy charging of their respective battery capacities.

Water Resistance

Water resistance is essential for any fitness tracker. Both the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5 offer water resistance, which means you can wear them while swimming or in the shower. However, there might be differences in the ratings that detail the level to which each device can be submerged without risk of damage.

Performance and Accuracy

When comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5, I focus on the details concerning GPS accuracy, the precision of fitness tracking, and the effectiveness of health monitoring features. Each of these elements play a crucial role in the performance of any fitness tracker.

GPS and Positioning Accuracy

The Amazfit Band 7 utilizes connected GPS, which means it relies on the GPS of the connected smartphone for positioning data. In my experience, this can sometimes lead to inconsistencies, especially if the phone’s GPS is not highly accurate. On the other hand, the Garmin Vivosmart 5 also uses connected GPS, but Garmin devices are generally known for better GPS reliability, which is crucial for accurate distance and pace metrics.

  • GPS Performance:
    • Amazfit Band 7: Requires smartphone connection; occasional inconsistencies.
    • Garmin Vivosmart 5: Generally reliable with smartphone connection.

Fitness Tracking Precision

Fitness tracking precision involves not just step count accuracy but also the monitoring of various exercises and understanding of multi-sport modes. I’ve found that the Amazfit Band 7 offers a wide range of workouts to track, with the added benefit of a cadence sensor, which is beneficial for runners. Garmin’s Vivosmart 5, while more expensive, typically provides higher precision in activity tracking, which justifies its cost for serious athletes.

  • Activity Tracking:
    • Amazfit Band 7: Extensive workouts, cadence sensor inclusion.
    • Garmin Vivosmart 5: High precision tracking, suited for multi-sport activity.

Health Monitoring Effectiveness

Lastly, health monitoring effectiveness evaluates the accuracy of heart rate monitors, the potential inclusion of an ECG sensor, and the ability to measure metrics like resting heart rate. The Garmin Vivosmart 5 includes a heart rate monitor known for its precision, while the Amazfit Band 7 lacks an ECG but offers valuable features like irregular heart rate warnings. Both lack a geomagnetic sensor, which could enhance their overall capability for health and fitness metrics.

  • Health Monitoring:
    • Amazfit Band 7: No ECG; offers resting heart rate and irregular heart rate warnings.
    • Garmin Vivosmart 5: Precise heart rate monitor; lacking ECG and geomagnetic sensor.

In terms of display, which indirectly impacts how we interact with and understand our health data, the Amazfit Band 7 features a 1.47-inch color OLED screen with a higher resolution, providing a clearer view compared to the Garmin Vivosmart 5 which has a smaller monochrome OLED display. This specification can influence how we read our health and performance data, as a clearer display may offer a better user experience.

Software and Ecosystem

Navigating the software and ecosystem of both the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5 reveals distinct experiences tailored to their respective users. My analysis focuses on how each fitness tracker integrates with smartphones and apps, and the varieties of accessories and additional services available within their ecosystems.

Compatibility with Smartphones and Apps

The Amazfit Band 7 operates smoothly with the Zepp app, which serves as the central hub on both Android and iOS devices to review data and customize settings. Notifications from my smartphone are relayed reliably, and I can also enjoy Alexa built-in for added convenience. On the other hand, Garmin Vivosmart 5 delivers a comprehensive service with the Garmin Connect app and supports ANT+ for connectivity, ensuring a broad range of compatibility with third-party fitness equipment and smartphones.

Amazfit Band 7:

  • App: Zepp app (Android & iOS)
  • Notifications: Calls, messages, app alerts
  • Extras: Alexa built-in, health tracker features

Garmin Vivosmart 5:

  • App: Garmin Connect (Android & iOS)
  • Notifications: Calls, messages, calendar reminders
  • Connectivity: ANT+ support, compatible with extensive fitness equipment

Ecosystem of Accessories and Additional Services

Garmin extends its ecosystem with a robust selection of accessories and services that complement the Vivosmart 5, including different strap options and integration with Garmin’s own range of products and services for a cohesive user experience. The route tracker function, enhanced by GPS and Galileo satellite support, is particularly vital for outdoor enthusiasts. In contrast, my Amazfit Band 7 aligns with a simpler ecosystem, focusing primarily on the core functionalities of the device itself.

  • Garmin Vivosmart 5:
    • Services: Garmin Coach, safety features
    • Accessories: Various strap options, ANT+ accessories
  • Amazfit Band 7:
    • Services: Limited to in-app features and watch faces
    • Accessories: Standard strap, no extensive accessory range

As I delve into their software and ecosystems, it’s evident that the Garmin Vivosmart 5 caters to a more connected and expansive user experience, while the Amazfit Band 7 keeps things streamlined with essential smart functions through its companion app.

Durability and Maintenance

When considering the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5, I focus on how well they stand up to everyday use and unexpected mishaps. The resilience of these devices is critical, especially for users who lead active lifestyles or are exposed to various environments.

Resistance to Elements

The Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5 both offer a degree of water resistance. I’ve learned that the Amazfit Band 7 is water-resistant up to 5 ATM, meaning it can withstand pressures equivalent to a depth of 50 meters. This makes it suitable for activities such as swimming or showering. In contrast, the Garmin Vivosmart 5 also provides water resistance, but specific details can be found at the Garmin Vivosmart 5 durability features.

Longevity and Repairability

I am particularly attentive to the longevity and repair potential of devices. The battery life plays a significant role here. For example, the Amazfit Band 7 is known for its extended battery life, lasting up to 18 days on a single charge under typical use, which suggests less frequent charging and, consequently, a potentially longer battery lifespan. Maintenance for either of these devices should ideally involve minimal repairs, but in the event of damage, users may find that items like the band or the battery are replaceable, subject to the manufacturer’s design and availability of parts. Both devices are likely to feature damage-resistant glass, such as Gorilla Glass, to protect against scratches and minor impacts. However, the presence and version of Gorilla Glass can impact the repairability and durability, so I recommend checking the specific iterations used in Amazfit Band 7 and Garmin Vivosmart 5 for confirmation.

Price and Value Comparison

When considering the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5, I find it essential to scrutinize the cost against the features they offer. It helps to establish which tracker presents the better value, especially for those on a tight budget.

Cost Analysis

The Amazfit Band 7 is remarkably affordable, typically found as one of the most budget-friendly options on the market. Viewing it at TradeInn USD, Amazon, or Best Buy, the price point is about $50. This cost offers an attractive specs comparison, considering its array of features.

In contrast, the Garmin Vivosmart 5 carries a higher price tag, generally retailing around $150. This makes it three times the cost of the Amazfit Band 7—a significant difference for price-sensitive consumers. You can explore its details on Versus.

Budget Considerations

For buyers working with a tight budget, the Amazfit Band 7 appears to be the clear winner on price alone. However, it’s crucial not just to consider the cheap price but also to evaluate what you get for your money.

If you’re asking which you should buy, it boils down to whether the Garmin Vivosmart 5’s specs justify the higher outlay. Garmin is known for its robust build and extensive fitness features, which may be indispensable to some users. Meanwhile, for those prioritizing cost above all else, the Amazfit Band 7 offers a comprehensive set of features at a fraction of the price, making it an appealing value proposition.

In conclusion, my price and value comparison indicates that both trackers offer distinct advantages depending on your budget and required features. It’s imperative to weigh the cost against the specs to determine the most suitable option for you.

Consumer Insights

When comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Garmin Vivosmart 5, it is essential to evaluate the perspectives and experiences of the users who have interacted with these products. These insights can effectively inform potential buyers about the practicality and value of each fitness tracker.

User Reviews and Feedback

I have noticed that user reviews for the Amazfit Band 7 highlight its affordability and the range of features it offers. For instance, on Android Central, consumers appreciate the device’s lengthy battery life and comprehensive health tracking tools. In comparison, the Garmin Vivosmart 5 receives praise on platforms like Screen Rant for its sturdy build and accurate activity tracking, although it comes at a higher price point. Some reviews even draw comparisons with other devices, oftentimes mentioning fitness trackers like the Fitbit Charge 5 or Xiaomi Mi Band 7, noting how each device stands in relation to these well-known alternatives.

Market Trends and Popularity

My analysis of market trends suggests that the popularity of affordable fitness trackers, like the Amazfit Band 7, is on the rise, especially on online marketplaces such as eBay. The convenience of features like call control and phone location has been particularly appealing to customers exploring smartwatches as part of their health and fitness routines. On the other hand, the longevity and brand reputation of Garmin products continue to ensure the popularity of the Garmin Vivosmart 5 amid a diverse consumer base that values reliability and precision in activity tracking. With health-conscious consumers frequently browsing options on Amazon, trends also show a consistent interest in models like the Fitbit Inspire 3 and previous iterations like the Garmin Vivosmart 4, indicating a competitive market filled with options catered to a variety of needs and preferences.

Final Verdict

In this final verdict, I’ll succinctly provide you with a summary of pros and cons for the Amazfit Band 7 and Garmin Vivosmart 5, along with recommendations to help you choose the tracker that best fits your needs.

Pros and Cons Summary

Amazfit Band 7

  • Pros:
    • Excellent battery life allows for extended use between charges.
    • Lightweight design provides comfort for all-day wear.
    • Affordability makes it a great entry-level option.
  • Cons:
    • The resolution and pixel density are lower compared to some competitors.
    • Limited memory capacity.
    • Lacks advanced features like body battery energy monitor and incident detection.

Garmin Vivosmart 5

  • Pros:
    • Advanced health tracking features like stress tracking, body battery energy monitoring, and irregular heart rate warnings.
    • Incident detection provides an added layer of safety.
    • Higher resolution and pixel density on the display for clearer visuals.
  • Cons:
    • Higher price point may not fit all budgets.
    • Shorter battery life necessitates more frequent charging.
    • It might be heavier on the wrist compared to some slim designs.

Recommendations Based on User Profile

For individuals seeking a budget-friendly fitness tracker with good battery life and basic functionality like heart rate monitoring and call control, the Amazfit Band 7 is an excellent choice. Its affordability and lightweight design make it well-suited for first-time users or those requiring a straightforward device to track daily activities.

Conversely, if you prioritize comprehensive health tracking over cost and do not mind charging your device more frequently, the Garmin Vivosmart 5 stands out. It’s ideal for users who value detailed insights like stress tracking, incident detection, and the body battery energy monitor. The higher resolution and pixel density of this device also make for a more pleasant viewing experience, which may be important for users who interact extensively with their device throughout the day.


  • Matthew

    Meet Matthew, a wearable tech & fitness enthusiast passionate about transforming health through innovative devices. With an engineering background and a love for fitness, Matthew shares in-depth reviews, tips, and news on the latest wearable tech to help you achieve your fitness goals.

Scroll to Top