Amazfit Band 7 vs Amazfit Bip 3: A Comparative Review

When deciding between the latest wearable tech, Amazfit’s offerings often come up as strong contenders. I’ve compared two popular models, the Amazfit Band 7 and the Amazfit Bip 3, which stand out in the market for their features and value for money.

As a fitness enthusiast and tech aficionado, I understand that choosing the right device can significantly enhance one’s fitness journey and daily convenience.

The Amazfit Band 7 is designed to be a sleek fitness tracker with an AMOLED display, offering vibrant colors and sharpness for exceptional readability. The display size of 1.47-inch with a resolution of 198 x 368 pixels makes it an ideal companion for those who prefer compact devices.

On the other hand, the Amazfit Bip 3 appeals to users who favor a larger screen, with its 1.69-inch TFT touchscreen and a resolution of 240 x 280 pixels, which closely resembles a traditional smartwatch. The Bip 3 combines the functionality of a fitness tracker with some of the essential features offered by smartwatches.

In my research and practical use, both models provide robust health monitoring and fitness tracking features, but with subtle differences that could determine the right choice for individuals.

The Band 7 boasts an extended battery life and a narrower design for a more comfortable fit, while the Bip 3 includes additional sensors like the SpO2 for blood oxygen measurement.

My goal is to give you a clear and unbiased comparison to help you decide which device might be the ideal fit for your lifestyle and fitness goals.

Design and Build Quality

In assessing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Amazfit Bip 3, it’s vital to consider the design and build quality as they directly impact user experience and wearability.

Dimensions and Weight Comparison

I find it essential to note the differences in dimensions and weight between these devices. The Amazfit Band 7 boasts a slimmer profile, which may appeal to users seeking a more lightweight and less obtrusive accessory. On the other hand, the Amazfit Bip 3 presents a slightly bulkier build, which is something to keep in mind for those who prioritize compactness.

Display Features

The display is where the Amazfit Band 7’s 1.47-inch AMOLED screen stands out with its vibrant colors and sharper resolution, providing an attractive visual experience. Conversely, the Amazfit Bip 3 features a larger 1.69-inch TFT touchscreen, which offers a different visual appeal and may affect readability and user interface navigation. Both devices include damage-resistant glass, adding a layer of durability to their design.

Water Resistance and Durability

When considering the resilience of these wearables, I’m particularly attentive to their water resistance ratings. Both models provide adequate protection against water, which means they can withstand splashes and brief immersion. This feature allows users to engage in activities involving water, such as swimming, without concern for their device’s integrity.

Core Features and Functionality

When comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Amazfit Bip 3, I focus on their health and fitness tracking capabilities, smart features and connectivity, and battery performance. Each aspect is crucial for anyone looking to integrate these devices into their daily routine.

Health and Fitness Tracking

Amazfit Band 7 features a 1.47-inch AMOLED display and provides comprehensive health tracking. It monitors heart rate with a high degree of accuracy thanks to its BioTracker 2 PPG biological optical sensor. In addition to heart rate, I’ve learned it does sleep tracking and supports a multi-sport mode, making it versatile for various physical activities.

In contrast, Amazfit Bip 3 sports a 1.69-inch TFT touchscreen and includes a PPG Bio Heart rate sensor. It also offers GPS capabilities for accurate route tracking. This feature is particularly handy for outdoor enthusiasts who require precise location tracking for activities like running or cycling.

Smart Features and Connectivity

Both models facilitate smart connectivity. I can pair them with a smartphone for notifications, calls, and app alerts. As for my NFC needs, neither device includes NFC capabilities, which means I can’t use them for contactless payments.

The Amazfit Band 7 edges out with extra features such as call control and the ability to locate a paired phone, which I find useful in day-to-day activities. Meanwhile, the Amazfit Bip 3 leverages its included GPS for location tracking without needing a connected phone, which I appreciate during my outdoor exercises.

Battery Performance and Charging

Battery life is a decisive factor for many users, including me. The Amazfit Band 7 boasts up to 18 days of battery life on a single charge, which is impressive and reduces the frequency of charging. The Bip 3 Pro, a variant of the Bip 3, offers a slightly shorter battery life of 14 days, still respectable but requiring more frequent charging. Both utilize efficient charging solutions—I can usually fully charge the devices in less than two hours.

In my usage, having long battery life minimizes the inconvenience of frequent charging routines and ensures that I can track my health and fitness without interruption.

Display and Resolution

When comparing the Amazfit Band 7 and the Amazfit Bip 3, the display characteristics such as screen type, resolution, and visibility are essential elements to consider. These features can significantly impact the user experience.

Screen Quality

The Amazfit Band 7 boasts a 1.47-inch AMOLED display, which is known for its deep blacks and vibrant colors. With a resolution of 198 x 368 pixels, it offers crisp visuals. I’ve found that the AMOLED technology also contributes to better battery efficiency due to its ability to light individual pixels rather than the entire screen. On the other hand, the Amazfit Bip 3 includes a 1.69-inch TFT touchscreen with lower resolution at 240 x 280 pixels. The Amazfit Band 7 vs Amazfit Bip 3: Which One to Choose? article indicates that even though the Bip 3’s screen is larger, the pixel density is not as high as on the Band 7, which could mean the image quality may not be as sharp.

Visibility and Brightness

I have observed that AMOLED displays typically perform better in various lighting conditions, providing excellent visibility and brightness. The Amazfit Band 7’s AMOLED display, therefore, can offer superior readability in both low and bright lighting situations. In contrast, the TFT technology used in the Amazfit Bip 3 might not be as vibrant under direct sunlight. The comparison between Amazfit Bip 3 Pro vs Amazfit Band 7 gives us insight into the visibility differences, with the AMOLED display taking precedence in readability and offering better visibility.

Price and Value for Money

When looking at the Amazfit Band 7 and Amazfit Bip 3 Pro, I consider not only their pricing but also how they stack up in terms of features for the cost. This ensures a comprehensive evaluation of their value for money.

Affordability and Cost-effectiveness

I find that the Amazfit Band 7 and the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro are priced competitively in the market of fitness trackers. The Bip 3 Pro, with its additional features such as built-in GPS and an atmospheric pressure sensor, might come at a slightly higher cost. Despite this, both options are generally considered affordable when compared to the wider range of smartwatches and fitness trackers with similar functionalities.

Price Comparison with Competitors

When comparing these two models to their competitors, I look for key features that influence the overall rating within their price range. The Amazfit Band 7 offers an impressive suite of health and fitness tracking capabilities, including heart rate monitoring and a high-resolution screen. The Bip 3 Pro extends these features with its advanced sensors, potentially justifying its slightly higher price point. Compared to others in their category, they often strike a balance between comprehensive features and affordability, securing a strong position in their segment.

I use this evidence-based approach to ensure that my assessment of the comparative value of the Amazfit Band 7 and Amazfit Bip 3 Pro is clear and unbiased. This allows readers to understand the pricing landscape and how each model measures up against their peers.

Compatibility and Ecosystem

In my experience with Amazfit products, compatibility plays a crucial role in the user experience. When it comes to the Amazfit Band 7 and the Amazfit Bip 3, their ability to integrate into existing digital ecosystems is essential for maximizing their functionality.

Cross-Platform Use

The Amazfit Band 7 and the Bip 3 both work seamlessly with Android and iOS devices. I’ve noticed that this cross-platform support is a significant advantage for users who enjoy flexibility and might switch between operating systems. The central hub for their functionality is the Zepp App, which serves as a comprehensive platform for syncing data, tweaking settings, and installing updates on both smartwatches and fitness trackers.

  • Android: Full compatibility with Android 5.0 and above.
  • iOS: Works with iOS 10.0 and higher.

App Integration and Ecosystem

Both devices link to the Zepp app, which I find to be quite robust and user-friendly. The app acts as a centralized ecosystem for all your health and fitness data regardless of whether you’re using the Band 7 or the Bip 3.

Key Features within the Zepp App:

  • Health Monitoring: Tracks your heart rate, sleep patterns, and offers health assessments.
  • Fitness Tracking: Logs workouts, counts steps, and monitors sports activities.

Through the Zepp app, connectivity with other apps and services is streamlined, allowing these fitness trackers to deliver notifications and alerts directly from your smartphone.

In summary, the Amazfit Band 7 and Bip 3 ensure a high degree of interoperability with major mobile operating systems, and through the Zepp app, they offer a cohesive and comprehensive ecosystem for managing connectivity and data.

Author

  • Matthew

    Meet Matthew, a wearable tech & fitness enthusiast passionate about transforming health through innovative devices. With an engineering background and a love for fitness, Matthew shares in-depth reviews, tips, and news on the latest wearable tech to help you achieve your fitness goals.

Scroll to Top